Comparative Analysis of Temperature-Responsive Hydrogel (PF 72) for Postoperative Pain After Bimaxillary Surgery: A Retro-spective Study.

Bimaxillary surgery is a painful invasive procedure in plastic surgery. Pain control is typically achieved using intravenous analgesics. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of a novel temperature-responsive hydrogel, PF72, mixed with ropivacaine, as a local pain management solution when applied directly to the surgical site following orthognathic surgery. The study was conducted from October 2022 to July 2023 and included a cohort of 40 candidates for orthognathic surgery, encompassing LeFort I maxillary ostectomy and sagittal split ramus osteotomy. The participants were divided into an Injection group (n = 20), where PF72 was administered at the surgical site before the orthognathic surgery, and a Control group (n = 20), which relied solely on intravenous analgesics. Pain was evaluated at 3, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery using a numerical rating scale (NRS). The mean NRS scores at 24 h were 6.35 and 4 for the Control and Injection groups, respectively. The mean NRS scores at 72 h were 3.4 and 2.55 for the Control and Injection groups, respectively. Patients who received PF72 experienced less pain than those who received intravenous analgesics. These findings underscore the potential of PF72 as an effective alternative for enhancing pain management in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.Level of Evidence III Therapeutic study. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Investigation of the efficacy of two different laser types in the treatment of lower lip paresthesia after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Orthognathic surgery involves invasive and major surgical procedures commonly used to correct maxillofacial deformities. Bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSO) is often used to treat dentofacial anomalies related to the mandible, but it can result in various complications, the most common of which is inferior alveolar nerve damage. Nerve damage-induced paresthesia of the lower lip significantly affects patient comfort. Medical treatments such as steroids and vitamin B, low-level laser therapy (LLLT), and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) can be used as supportive therapies for nerve regeneration after damage. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of two different types of lasers in treating lower lip paresthesia after BSSO. This clinical trial was a controlled, single-center, prospective, single-blind, randomized study. Thirty patients were included in the study and randomly assigned to three groups: Group I (laser GRR, n = 10) received transcutaneous and transmucosal GRR laser treatment, Group II (Epic10 laser, n = 10) received transmucosal and transcutaneous Epic10 laser treatment, and Group III (vitamin B, n = 10) received B-complex vitamin tablets orally once a day. Two-point and brush tests were performed six times at specific intervals, and a visual analog scale was used to evaluate pain and sensitivity. Both vitamin B and laser therapies accelerated nerve regeneration. The contribution of the laser groups to the healing rate was better than that of the vitamin B group. Although there was no statistically significant difference between the two laser groups, clinical observations indicated better results in the GRR laser group.

Determining the safety margin of mandibular lingula in sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

PURPOSE: The anatomical position of the lingula is clinically very important to prevent injuries during sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Our study aims to evaluate the localisation of the lingula by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to compare the localisation of the lingula between malocclusion, gender, and lingula types. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the shape and location of the lingula using CBCT. A total of 250 CBCT images were included in this study. The lingula was classified as nodular, assimilated, truncated, or triangular type. Six defined distances from the top of the lingula were measured: anterior border of the ramus (L-A), posterior border of the ramus (L-P), internal oblique ridge (L-IOR), mandibular notch (L-N), and distal surface of the mandibular second molar (L-M2) and occlusal plane (L-OP). The measured distances were compared between gender, malocclusion, and lingula types. RESULTS: The most common type of lingula was nodular (32.4%). The L-N, L-P, L-M2, and L-OP distances between genders were statistically higher in male patients than in female patients. The L-IOR, L-M2, and L-OP distances exhibited statistically significant differences found between malocclusions. No statistically significant difference was found when the distances of the lingula to the anatomical points were compared between the lingula types. CONCLUSION: These variations in positioning of the lingula depending on the dysmorphoses are developing towards a systematic 3D examination before any mandibular osteotomy to precisely visualize the position and shape of the lingula.

Effect of betamethasone injection into the pterygomandibular space on the neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a pilot study.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of local betamethasone injection into the pterygomandibular space on postoperative neurosensory deficits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective controlled clinical study was conducted on 16 patients (6 male, 10 female; mean age, 24.95 ± 9.22 years) who underwent bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy for mandibular discrepancies. One side of each patient's mandible was randomly selected as the control side, and the opposite side as the experimental side. On the experimental side, a solution of betamethasone (6 mg/1 ml) was injected into the pterygomandibular space after the completion of wound closure. Neurosensory tests, including light touch, two-point discrimination, direction of movement, thermal sensitivity, and pin-prick discrimination, were performed. The follow-up period ranged between 6 and 12 months, according to the particular sensory test. The Fisher exact test was used to analyse the data. RESULTS: The light touch sensation was abnormal in 75% of the control side and 31% of the study side, with the difference being significant (p = 0.03). However, at 6 months, all the study cases regained touch sensation, compared to 69% of the control side. No significant difference in direction movement discrimination was seen; however, at 3 months, the study side showed significantly less direction sensation (19%) compared to the control side (56%) (p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the two-point discrimination; however, at 3 months, the study side had a significantly less abnormal two-point sensation (13%) than the control side (56%) (p = 0.02). In addition, no significant difference was noted in thermal sensitivity or pin-prick sensation. CONCLUSION: Betamethasone injection into the pterygomandibular space reduces neurosensory disturbances after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomies nd leads to faster recovery of sensations.

Facial Palsy after Orthognathic Surgery: Incidence, Causative Mechanism, Management, and Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Facial palsy after orthognathic surgery is an uncommon but serious complication causing dissatisfaction and affecting quality of life. The occurrence could be underreported. Surgeons need to recognize this issue regarding the incidence, causative mechanism, managements, and outcome. METHODS: A retrospective review of orthognathic surgery records between January of 1981 and May of 2022 was conducted in the authors' craniofacial center. Patients who developed facial palsy after the surgery were identified, and demographics, surgical methods, radiologic images, and photographs were collected. RESULTS: A total of 20,953 sagittal split ramus osteotomies (SSROs) were performed in 10,478 patients. Twenty-seven patients developed facial palsy, resulting in an incidence of 0.13% per SSRO. In a comparison of SSRO technique, the Obwegeser-Dal Pont technique using osteotome for splitting had higher risk of facial palsy than the Hunsuck technique using the manual twist splitting ( P < 0.05). The severity of facial palsy was complete in 55.6% of patients and incomplete in 44.4%. All patients were treated conservatively, and 88.9% attained full recovery in a median duration of 3 months [interquartile range (IQR), 2.75 to 6 months] after surgery, whereas 11.1% attained partial recovery. Initial severity of facial palsy predicted the timing of recovery, with incomplete palsy patients having faster median recovery (3 months; IQR, 2 to 3 months) than the complete palsy patients (6 months; IQR, 4 to 6.25 months) ( P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of facial palsy after orthognathic surgery was 0.13%. Intraoperative nerve compression was the most likely causative mechanism. Conservative treatment is the mainstay of therapeutic strategy, and full functional recovery was anticipated. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, IV.

The biomechanical effects of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy and bimaxillary osteotomies to the patients with maxillofacial deformities under incisal clenching.

OBJECTIVE: Bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) and bimaxillary osteotomies (BSSRO plus Lefort1 osteotomy) are widely used to solve maxillofacial deformities. The effect of the surgeries on the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is still not clear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the preoperative and postoperative stress environment of the patients and to compare the biomechanical differences of the two surgeries. METHODS: Ten patients were performed BSSRO and fourteen underwent bimaxillary osteotomies. Eleven asymptomatic subjects were recruited to be the control group. The muscle forces of incisal clenching were applied on the finite element models. And contact was used to simulate the interactions within the TMJs. RESULTS: two kinds of surgeries could not completely eliminate the negative biomechanical distribution within the TMJs. CONCLUSION: Compared to BSSRO only, the bimaxillary osteotomies could better repair the biomechanical environment of the TMJs under incisal clenching. And the TMD symptoms were strongly related to the stress distributions of the TMJs.

Quantifying bone healing after mandibular displacement in orthognathic surgery.

Impaired bony healing following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is a major unmet medical need for affected patients, and rare occurrences can hinder the identification of underlying risk factors. We hypothesised that osseous union following BSSO can be quantified using volumetric analysis, and we aimed to identify the risk factors for impaired bone healing. The percentage change in bony volume was measured in orthognathic patients following BSSO using two consecutive postoperative cone-beam computed tomography scans. Patients' characteristics and treatment parameters were documented, and correlation and regression analyses of these variables performed. Thirty-six patients (23 men and 13 women) with a mean (SD) age of 33.28 (11.86) years were included. The gap site (lingual versus buccal) (p < 0.01) had a significant impact on the change in volume. Age (p = 0.06) showed a trend towards significance. Initial width of the osteotomy gap, sex, and indication for surgery did not influence osseous healing. Increased age at surgery and the side of the buccal osteotomy are independent risk factors for impaired osseous healing following BSSO.

Relationship of the Degree of Nerve Exposure and Surgical Manipulation and Short-Term Neurosensory Disturbance Following Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Neurosensory disturbance (NSD) is a common complication after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) due to inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury. The impact of intraoperative nerve manipulation on NSD remains debated. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of IAN exposure and manipulation during SSRO on functional sensory recovery (FSR). STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-center, prospective cohort study of 40 patients undergoing SSRO at Mahidol University from December 2020 to December 2021. The inclusion criteria were patients aged 20-34, ASA Class I-II. The exclusion criteria were patients with systemic bone disease, history of head and neck or neurological pathology, previous SSRO, or incomplete data collection. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: Degree of intraoperative nerve manipulation was divided by the attending surgeon as follows; 1) Nerve fully encased in distal segment and not visible (NS); 2) Nerve encased in distal segment but partially visible (DS); and 3) Nerve partially encased in proximal segment and fully dissected free (PS). OUTCOME VARIABLES: The area of interest was divided into the lip and chin. The primary outcome was time to FSR. The secondary outcome was subjective patient report, using a visual analogue scale, compared to FSR. COVARIATES: The covariates were sex, age, skeletal diagnosis, degree of movement, and concomitant genioplasty/subapical procedure. ANALYSES: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression, and Mcnemar test were utilized. P-value < .05 was significant. RESULTS: In the lip, the median times to FSR were NS, 2 days; DS, 45 days; PS, 102 days. (Interquartile range: 77,127, 114, respectively) In the chin, the median times to FSR were NS, 23 days; DS, 92 days; PS, 87 days. (Interquartile range: 77, 161, 101, respectively.) Nerve manipulation significantly affected FSR in the lip and chin (P = .001, <0.001, respectively. Cox hazard ratios for DS and PS were lower compared to NS. Patients consistently reported more NSD compared to FSR as per Mcnemar test. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: After SSRO, FSR in the lip is prolonged when the IAN is partially encased in the proximal segment and released. This raises the question of the efficacy of surgically releasing a partially encased IAN.

Risk factors for postoperative infection after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective clinical study investigated risk factors for infection following bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSO) as orthognathic surgery, including the patients' general condition, local factors, and surgical factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The cases of 160 mandibular sites of 80 Japanese patients (26 males, 54 females; mean ± SD age: 25.3 ± 7.7 years, range 16-55 yrs) with a jaw deformity who underwent BSSO orthognathic surgery at our Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery between Jan. 2017 and Dec. 2022 were analyzed. Potential risk factors were classified as clinical predictive variables. Descriptive and univariate statistics were computed. A multivariate analysis was performed with logistic regression. RESULTS: Fifteen mandibular sites (9.4 %) were complicated with postoperative infection. The multivariate analysis revealed significant differences in facial asymmetry (OR 24.0, p = 0.0002) and the amount of mandibular movement (OR 0.664, p = 0.011) between the sites with and without infection. CONCLUSIONS: Among clinical variables, facial asymmetry was the strongest risk factor for post-BSSO infection, followed by the amount of mandibular movement.

Computed tomography evaluation of risk factors for an undesirable buccal split during sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) sometimes induces an irregular split pattern referred to as a bad split. We investigated the risk factors for bad splits in the buccal plate of the ramus during SSRO. Ramus morphology and bad splits in the buccal plate of the ramus were assessed using preoperative and postoperative computed tomography images. Of the 53 rami analyzed, 45 had a successful split, and 8 had a bad split in the buccal plate. Horizontal images at the height of the mandibular foramen showed that there were significant differences in the ratio of the forward thickness to the backward thickness of the ramus between patients with a successful split and those with a bad split. In addition, the distal region of the cortical bone tended to be thicker and the curve of the lateral region of the cortical bone tended to be smaller in the bad split group than in the good split group. These results indicated that a ramus shape in which the width becomes thinner towards the back frequently induces bad splits in the buccal plate of the ramus during SSRO, and more attention should be paid to patients who have rami of these shapes in future surgeries.

What are the Effects of Internal Fixation on Trigeminal Neurosensory Function and the Temporomandibular Joints Following Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy?

PURPOSE: Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) has, traditionally, been accomplished without internal fixation, necessitating a period of maxillomandibular fixation (MMF). With advances in instrumentation, internal fixation of IVRO is feasible, obviating the need for MMF. The purpose is to investigate the effects of transoral internal fixation on the prevalence of third division trigeminal nerve (CNV3) injury, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthralgia, and surgical site bleeding following IVRO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent IVRO at Vanderbilt University Medical Center between January 2017 and December 2020. The primary predictor variable was fixation status-internal fixation versus MMF. The primary outcome variable was postoperative CNV3 neurosensory disturbance. The secondary outcome variables were TMJ arthralgia and surgical site bleeding. Statistical analysis included Fisher's exact test and McNemar's Chi-squared test. RESULTS: Seventy two subjects (59 IVROs without internal fixation and 65 IVROs with internal fixation) were studied. The frequency of CNV3 neurosensory deficit was 0% in the IVRO without internal fixation group and 3.1% in the IVRO with internal fixation group (P = .49). Within group analysis showed a decreased frequency of postoperative TMJ arthralgia compared to preoperative records in both groups (IVRO without internal fixation group, P = .04 and IVRO with internal fixation group, P = .004). The frequency of active surgical site bleeding controlled with local measures was 1.7% in the IVRO without internal fixation group and 3.1% in the IVRO with internal fixation group (P = 1). CONCLUSION: Internal fixation of IVRO is associated with low incidence of neurosensory deficit, TMJ arthralgia, and active surgical site bleeding.

Manejo quirúrgico de bad split bilateral en cirugía ortognática / Surgical management of bilateral bad split during orthognathic surgery

El bad split es un término clínico que refiere a una fractura no planificada que ocurre al momento de realizar una osteotomía sagital de rama mandibular (OSRM). Afecta aproximadamente al 2,3% de los pacientes y se han descrito factores de riesgo tales como la presencia de terceros molares mandibulares, edad avanzada al momento de la cirugía, técnica de osteotomía inadecuada, entre otros. Se recomienda efectuar manio-bras preventivas para evitar la aparición de patrones de fractura no deseados al realizar la OSRM. Sin embargo, al momento de pesquisar un bad split, éste debe ser tratado por un equipo capacitado y de manera oportuna para evitar retardo en la consolidación, infecciones y secuestros óseos que puedan comprometer los resultados de la cirugía. En este artículo se presenta el manejo de un caso clínico de bad split bilateral intraoperatorio por el Servicio de Cirugía Maxilofacial del Hospital San José, enfatizando su tratamiento quirúrgico.

Bad Split is a clinical term referring to an unplanned fracture that occurs during the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). It affects approximately 2,3% of the patients undergoing orthognathic surgery and several risk factors have been described such as the presence of mandibular third molars, advanced age at the moment of orthognathic surgery, inadequate osteotomy technique, etc. Preventive maneuvers are recommended in order to avoid the appearance of undesired fracture patterns during BSSO. However, if a bad split is detected it must be managed and treated by a qualified team to avoid further complications such as delayed bone consolidation, bone infection and necrosis. In this article we present the management of a case of bilateral bad split by the Maxillofacial Surgery Service of Hospital San José, emphasizing on its surgical treatment.

Effects of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy and bimaxillary osteotomies on stress distribution of temporomandibular joints in patients with maxillofacial deformity under asymmetric occlusions.

Bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) and bimaxillary osteotomies (BSSRO plus Lefort1 osteotomy) are representative surgeries to solve maxillofacial deformity. It is important to understand the biomechanical impact of the surgeries on the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). The purpose of this study is to compare the stress variations of the patients before and after the two surgeries. Twenty-four patients with maxillofacial deformities and 14 asymptomatic subjects were recruited to be the preoperative group and control group in this study. Ten patients were performed BSSRO and other 14 underwent bimaxillary osteotomies. Finite element models of the preoperative, postoperative, and control groups were established according to the CBCT data of the subjects. The muscle forces of the left and right unilateral occlusion were applied on the models. And the contact was used to simulate the interaction within the TMJs and between the maxillary and mandibular teeth. Under the asymmetric occlusion, bimaxillary osteotomies were found to be superior to BSSRO in the stress distributions of the TMJs. The magnitude of the asymmetric stresses was strongly correlated with the TMD symptoms in the patients. And the stress variation of the postoperative TMJs was the cause of the improvement or aggravation of the TMD symptoms.

The Unfavourable Split: a novel classification and an 11-year retrospective study looking at alternative methods for management of this well-known complication.

An unfavourable split is a well-known complication following a sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) of the mandible. Our aim was to analyse all unfavourable mandibular splits that had occurred when carrying out a SSO with the aim to design a classification which can facilitate management. We carried out a retrospective study analysing all orthognathic surgery from January 2010 until April 2021. Data surrounding unfavourable splits during this period were specifically analysed. Orthognathic surgery during this period was performed by a single OMFS unit with osteotomies performed by a single surgeon and their trainee. The dataset included 311 patients who underwent either a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) or a bimaxillary osteotomy. There were 225 bimaxillary osteotomies and 86 BSSOs. Twenty-one patients had unfavourable splits following their BSSO with a total of 22 out of 622 sagittal split osteotomies over this 11-year period. Bilateral unfavourable splits occurred in one patient. These results correlate to an incidence rate of 6.8% of unfavourable splits following SSO's in an 11-year period. The results reveal common patterns of unfavourable splits to suggest a simple classification based on our results. This can be applied to any unfavourable splits in SSO which then allows the clinician to proceed with surgery and prevent abandonment of the procedure. It is classified as follows: Type 1 fractures where the mandibular condyle is attached to the proximal fragment; Type 2 fractures whereby the mandibular condyle is attached to the tooth-bearing segment; Type 3 fractures are lingual cortex fractures. Each of these fracture types has a specific management protocol, which we recommend is used in all unfavourable splits.

Does the presence of third molars during sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy favour complications? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess whether the presence of inferior third molars during sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy increases the risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications. The PRISMA protocol was followed in this study, and the review was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42020147642). A search was conducted in the MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and Scopus databases on November 1, 2021. Nineteen articles were included, and the variables analysed were unfavourable fractures, infection, neurosensory disturbance, removal of osteosynthesis material, and duration of surgery. Meta-analyses were performed for the variables unfavourable fractures (risk ratio (RR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-1.57, P = 0.84), infection (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48-1.18, P = 0.21), and neurosensory disturbance (RR 1.55, 95% CI 0.61-3.91, P = 0.35); no statistically significant difference in the risk of these variables was found between the groups with and without third molars. The third molars did not increase the need to remove fixation material, but increased the surgery time. The presence of the third molar during sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy appears not to increase the risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications. The results presented here must be interpreted with caution due to the heterogeneity presented by the observational studies included.

Influence of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Exposure During Sagittal Split Osteotomy on the Rate and Timing of Baseline Sensory Recovery.

PURPOSE: Neurosensory disturbance is the most common consequence of sagittal split osteotomy (SSO). The purpose of this study is to quantitatively assess neurosensory deficiency and recovery to the preoperative status when the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) was exposed versus unexposed during SSO. METHODS: This is a single-center, prospective, cohort study of all patients undergoing bilateral SSO between August 2018 and July 2019. Patients were included in the study sample if they underwent bilateral SSO with an intact intraoperative IAN and were received follow-up assessment for at least a year. The predictor variable was the intraoperative IAN status (exposed vs unexposed). The outcomes of interest were the rate and timing of recovery to the preoperative status. The covariates were age, sex, and the magnitude and direction of surgical movements. Neurosensory function was quantitatively evaluated using the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test at follow-up intervals of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Descriptive statistics, bivariate statistics, Cox proportional hazards regression, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed. P value <.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of 90 patients, 86 patients who underwent 172 SSOs were included in this study. The mean age was 22.95 ± 3.34 years (range, 17 to 30), 65 were women, and the range of surgical movements was 3 to 8.3 mm of advancement and 2 to 12 mm of setback. Eighty-five nerves (49.4%) were allocated to the unexposed group, and 87 (50.6%) to the exposed group, with statistically significant differences in the rate and timing of recovery (hazard ratio = 2.368; 95% confidence interval, 1.662 to 3.376; P < .001). Among those with recovered nerves, the median time to recovery was 90 days in the unexposed group and 364 days in the exposed group (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: IAN exposure during SSO is associated with an increased risk of neurosensory deficiency and an increased time of sensory recovery to the baseline threshold in patients aged 17 to 30 years. When the IAN remained fully enclosed in the canal of the distal segment, only 11% of patients had a measurable sensory deficit 1 year after surgery. In those patients with any degree of IAN exposure, 36% had a residual sensory deficit 1 year after surgery.

Influence of different treatment procedures on the temporomandibular joint after mandibular setback in skeletal class III - A retrospective study.

The aim of this study was to clarify the effects of three different orthognathic surgical procedures on the temporomandibular joint after mandibular setback. Conventional sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with segmental fixation (conv-SSRO), intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO), or SSRO without fixation followed by the physiological positioning strategy (nonfix-SSRO) was performed for mandibular setback. Temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) symptoms were clinically assessed, and the condylar head angle was measured. In total, 129 patients participated. Preoperative TMD and treatment procedure were related to postoperative TMD. A menton deviation of 3.43 mm was the cutoff for the risk of postoperative TMD. The incidence rate of postoperative TMD in the conv-SSRO group was higher than that in the IVRO (p = 0.0197) and nonfix-SSRO (p = 0.0001) groups in asymmetric cases. There was no significant postoperative change in the temporomandibular joint space in each group. In symmetric and asymmetric cases, the condylar head was rotated inwards by 5.82 ± 4.75° (p < 0.0001) and 5.44 ± 3.10° (p < 0.0001), respectively, in the conv-SSRO group, and outwards by -7.98 ± 5.05° (p < 0.0001) and -8.32 ± 6.38° (p < 0.0001), respectively, in the IVRO group, but it was almost stable in the nonfix-SSRO group. Within the limitations of the study it seems that nonfix-SSRO should be preferred over conv-SSRO and IVRO whenever appropriate.

Comparison of short-term condylar positional changes in mandibular prognathism after surgery-first approach: Symmetric setback versus asymmetric setback.

The aim of this study was to compare how the displacement of the mandibular condyle changed after symmetric or asymmetric mandibular setback surgery using the surgery-first approach (SFA). Patients who underwent mandibular setback surgery using the SFA were selected and divided into a symmetry group (n = 18) with differences of less than 2 mm between the right and left setback, and an asymmetry group (n = 18) with a difference of greater than 2 mm. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-generated cephalograms were obtained after three-dimensional superimposition of CBCT images taken before surgery (T0), within one week after surgery (T1), and seven months after surgery (T2). The condylar positions were measured. Condylar positional changes according to time were compared between the two groups and correlation analysis was performed. There were significant positional changes in mandibular condyles over time in both groups. However, most of these changes returned to their initial state. In the asymmetry group, there was a greater internal rotation of the mandibular condyle on the lesser setback side. The correlation analysis results revealed that only the setback difference was associated with rotational displacement of the condyle on the lesser setback side at two time points (T1-T0, T2-T0). In the SFA, significant condylar displacement occurred immediately after both symmetric and asymmetric mandibular setback surgery, and the right/left difference in mandibular setback showed a significant positive correlation with rotational displacement. Although more significant rotational displacement of the mandibular condyle was observed after asymmetric mandibular setback surgery, the amount was not large enough to be clinically significant.

Effect of modified bilateral sagittal split osteotomy on inferior alveolar nerve neurosensory disturbance.

The aim of this study was to assess the occurrence of neurosensory disturbance of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) following modified mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) that preserves the mandibular inferior border. All patients undergoing BSSO, associated or not with a Le Fort I osteotomy (performed by the same senior operator) between January 2018 and December 2019, were eligible. The modified BSSO consists of a modification of the technique described by Epker: the bony section of the buccal cortex stops 3-4 mm above the basal mandibular edge. While respecting the basilar border, sectioning is then performed up to the gonial angle where bicortical section is finally performed. Sensibility of the labial and chin area was evaluated immediately postoperatively, and at six months and two years of follow up. A total of 140 eligible patients underwent the modified BSSO between January 2018 and December 2019, and 72 were included. Hypoaesthesia was found in 81.9% of the patients (59/72 patients) at initial evaluation. It decreased to 45.8% (33/72 patients) at the six-month examination and to 12.5% (9/72 patients) at the last examination. Four bad splits were recorded. The modified BSSO preserves the inferior border of the mandible and maintains the IAN in the lingual fragment. There is no need to release the IAN, hence its manipulation is reduced and the incidence of IAN postoperative hypoaesthesia is also reduced.

Radiologic Risk Factors for Persistent Mandibular Nerve Neurosensory Disturbance Following Sagittal Split Osteotomy.

PURPOSE: Neurosensory disturbance (NSD) occurring in the lower lips and chin is a major postoperative complication related to bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (SSO). The purpose of this study is to identify preoperative radiographic findings following SSO procedure associated with persistent NSD. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data for consecutive patients who underwent SSO. Primary predictor variables, including ramus width, mandibular body height, mandibular angle length, gonial angle, distance from mental foramen to distal aspect of mandibular second molar (MFD), and measurement of bone marrow space (BMS), were examined in a series of radiographic images. The primary outcome variable was NSD. Patients with NSD were divided into 2 groups based on findings obtained 1 year postoperatively: persistent, for those with NSD remaining after 1 year, and transient, when NSD occurred for less than 1 year. Covariates included sex and age. Comparisons were analyzed by use of Mann-Whitney U test or χ2 test. Multivariate analysis was performed using step-wise logistic regression to determine significant factors related to persistent NSD. A P value .005 or less was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of the 349 sides investigated, the persistent NSD group consisted of 59 sides (16.9%), while the transient NSD group consisted of 290 sides (83.1%). The occurrence of persistent NSD was correlated with age (P < .05), MFD (P < .001), mandibular body height (P < .05), and BMS (P < .001). Multivariate logistic analysis also showed a significant association of MFD (P < .001) and BMS (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative MFD and BMS are radiographic findings that are associated with an increased risk for persistent NSD following SSO procedure.